+- FreeBeg (https://www.freebeg.com/forum)
+-- Forum: Everything else (https://www.freebeg.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=11)
+--- Forum: Chit chat (https://www.freebeg.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=10)
+--- Thread: Bloodmoney's Ending and Replayability (/showthread.php?tid=76923)
Bloodmoney's Ending and Replayability - daisymaria - 09-18-2025
What sets Bloodmoney apart from a one-time-only game are its three branching endings, each tied to your level of brutality:
- Good Ending: Reach $25,000 without buying murderous tools like scissors. Rely on patience (or an auto-clicker) to “earn money the honest way” with minimal bloodshed. This is the hardest path, requiring persistence and restraint—you indicate a need for strong will or outside assistance.
- Bad Ending: Overdo it, amassing more than you need (up to $99,999). You pocket the extra money, skip the surgery, and flee, embracing your greed. This path opens up Harvey’s darkest images and most heartbreaking pleas.
- Neutral Ending: A neutral ending, where you earn money but at a moderate cost, leaving your humanity ambiguous.
These endings encourage replayability, with you theorizing about Harvey's backstory on Reddit. A post on r/GameTheorists compiles the "truth" about Harvey Harvington, speculates about his family (including his wife Eun Mi), and hints at sequels like Human Expenditure Program, a Tamagotchi-style game where you'll care for (or torment) him even more. The community buzzes that Harvey is "stuck in game after game," adding yet more layers of subtext to the plot.